I look forward to keeping you all updated.
http://chumly.com/n/196a770
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Friday, December 28, 2012
Monday, October 15, 2012
[Resent id=24533991 2012-10-16 00:03:41 from mariogoico] It doesn't get any better than this! What a peachy day!
https://chumly.com/n/1765de2
https://chumly.com/n/1765de2
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
It's a beautiful day in Kansas.
We are all keeping our eye on the redistricting to see if new district lines will be drawn. I will keep you posted if the boundaries in our District change.
http://chumly.com/n/13cadfb
http://chumly.com/n/13cadfb
Saturday, May 19, 2012
Dear friends,
I firmly believe that tax reform is an effective economic growth tool and that it is imperative for Kansas to do something this year to change our dismal economic path. For the past decade our history has been to grow taxes and increase state spending. This has led to job loss in the private sector and one of the slowest growth rates in the nation.
The Kansas Legislature has produced very few bills this election year that will actually become law. Shared goals and easy to enact legislation has been caught in heated battles, each faction adding language that infuriates others. The moderate-republican/democratic led Senate and the conservative-republican run House have written legislation that dies right away or is assured of going nowhere in the other chamber. This tactic is known as a "poison pill", because most of the time it causes the bill to be killed. This year this has been exceptionally painful because we are facing the"perfect political storm” of slow economic recovery, high unemployment, changing all the legislative districts (as a result of the census), the state senate running for reelection, and a new Governor, who is committed to fulfill his campaign promises of growth and increased jobs.
In my opinion, based on the letters and emails that I receive, constituents are not fully informed about the legislative process, and as they look at some of the votes, they do not know the details of what really happened. I know that sometimes these details are difficult to understand. The media can put legislators in a tough spot because voters not being fully informed about why members voted in a certain way can be led to the wrong conclusions. The only way to combat this situation is through communications. In my case, I do not have a staff or a budget to communicate with my constituents, and I cannot depend on the newspapers to get the message right. I often wonder if the reporter attended the same meeting that I did. I can send news releases to the local newspaper, but quite often they will not be published.
The 2012 tax reform bill just highlighted the details of this struggle. The House has been working with the Governor to lower personal income taxes for Kansans and to make our state more competitive in our region. Our logic is that when taxpayers have more money, they have higher levels of economic activity which in turn drives up state revenues and creates a lot of additional jobs,"the multiplier effect.” This is demonstrated by low-tax high growth states throughout the country.
This brings us to my front-line-trench observations of what happened on the tax bill. The Senate, earlier this session, loaded-up the Governor’s tax-cutting bill with a lot of sparkling cuts designed to generate campaign fodder for themselves. But this bill had so many large tax cuts, which they thought it would be assurance of a defeat in the House. The Senate expressed their excuse that the purpose was to get a bill to take into a House-Senate conference committee where it could be pared back to an affordable level. However, the issue is never the issue. The real political reason, in my opinion, was to have an Etch-a-Sketch ability to change positions for the election. The senate moderates saw this as a way to win both ways: brag about cutting taxes in postcards in the upcoming election, and at the same time spend a lot of money in state services, to the satisfaction of their political supporters, since they thought that once their tax bill was killed there will be no reduction in taxes this session. The factions often disagree over whether a provision is a purposeful poison pill or simply a demonstration of the majority's ability to write bills reflecting their own priorities, you can be the judge.
We witnessed an historic parliamentary battle. Earlier in the day we received credible information that the senate leadership planned to break its promise on the tax conference committee agreement. Instead of passing the agreed-to compromise they planned to kill the conference committee report with the resulting procedural effect of killing the underlying Senate tax plan, which they had passed earlier in the session. This would have left Kansas without a tax reduction this year to prime the lagging economy.
Concerned about this imminent procedural move, the Governor asked to address our House caucus. He urged us to protect progress on the tax reform by concurring in the Senate amendments to the tax plan. He did this in good faith as the only remaining pathway available to prevent the Senate from killing all hope of tax reform in 2012.
In an unprecedented conflict, the Kansas House and Senate went head-to-head in a procedural/filibuster battle. Each legislative body used parliamentary moves in an effort to be the first chamber to take the deciding action.
The result was almost identical rules, by the Senate President and House Speaker, forcing an end to filibuster debate and a vote on the respective tax programs. The interruption of debate drew outraged comments on both floors.
In the House, the howls of protest came from democrats and moderate republicans who opposed the measure before the House. But in the Senate, the same howls of protest came from conservative republicans, using the same indignant words that cited the unfairness of limiting debate of an important issue. Although the politics in either chamber sharply contrast each other, the rhetoric of indignation was virtually identical. The words were used interchangeably by conservative-republicans in the Senate and moderate-republicans/democrats on the House floor.
As the drama continued to unfold the opposition voices used explanation of vote to prolong the filibuster in both chambers, the leadership imposed time limits to reduce debate. This was done to allow the competing chamber an opportunity to approve their version. Since the senate is a smaller body, they were at a disadvantage to the House. So opposition members extended their filibuster by rising and requesting that they be allowed to "join" another member in that member's remarks, this took several additional minutes.
Every single member was undoubtedly aware of what was happening. The Senate was racing to kill tax reform before the House had a chance to save it. In the House we followed the Rules of the House and Mason’s Manual of Legislative Procedure. Mason’s specifically addresses the dilatory tactics by members intending to delay consideration of legislative business. This is what the Speaker used to end debate. Parliamentary rules are in place to protect both the members and the institution. They should neither be abused nor ignored. However, a lot of people were upset by the process. I think that it will take a lot of diplomacy and political pragmatism to bring this session to a reasonable end.
House Speaker, Mike O'Neal, won the day by summarily cutting-off debate. Thus, the House won the stand-off, gaining a final action vote on its version of the tax bill and approving it on a 64-59 margin. Moments later, the President of the Senate conceded defeat by announcing that the House action had effectively killed the Senate's debate. The bill that was sent to the Governor is the Senate’s own plan (It passed the Senate on a vote of 29-11).
This tax bill, approved by the House, has been dubbed the "nuclear option" because it projects state government deficits of more than $2 billion in coming years. Meanwhile, the failed conference committee report before the Senate had a much lower price tag and was the product of both chambers’ committees.
Where does that leave the tax issue? The Governor is faced with either signing a bill with a huge price tag that can only be offset by the very optimistic and unrealistic projections of economic growth, or the other option is to hold this tax bill and await receipt of a new tax compromise. If he gets the compromise, he’ll sign it. If he doesn’t, he’ll sign the original bill. The bottom line is that the Senate has the ultimate control over what choice the Governor makes.
Although this tax plan is not the House’s first choice, the House is committed to enact reform this year, and hopes that the Senate will take action on the proposal previously agreed upon during the conference committee. The final budget agreement is contingent on whether such a tax compromise is reached and passed. Passage of a tax compromise would give the Budget Conference Committee more flexibility toward meeting budget goals and maintaining a healthy ending balance. In my opinion both of these issues are also dependant on having an agreement on re-districting.
There are concerns by many people on the impact of this dramatic tax reform. I hope that you take the time to share your thoughts on this issue. We all have the same goal for our state, growth and quality of life; we just might have different perspectives on how we get there.
In service to Kansas,
Rep Mario Goico
https://chumly.com/n/1387631
I firmly believe that tax reform is an effective economic growth tool and that it is imperative for Kansas to do something this year to change our dismal economic path. For the past decade our history has been to grow taxes and increase state spending. This has led to job loss in the private sector and one of the slowest growth rates in the nation.
The Kansas Legislature has produced very few bills this election year that will actually become law. Shared goals and easy to enact legislation has been caught in heated battles, each faction adding language that infuriates others. The moderate-republican/democratic led Senate and the conservative-republican run House have written legislation that dies right away or is assured of going nowhere in the other chamber. This tactic is known as a "poison pill", because most of the time it causes the bill to be killed. This year this has been exceptionally painful because we are facing the"perfect political storm” of slow economic recovery, high unemployment, changing all the legislative districts (as a result of the census), the state senate running for reelection, and a new Governor, who is committed to fulfill his campaign promises of growth and increased jobs.
In my opinion, based on the letters and emails that I receive, constituents are not fully informed about the legislative process, and as they look at some of the votes, they do not know the details of what really happened. I know that sometimes these details are difficult to understand. The media can put legislators in a tough spot because voters not being fully informed about why members voted in a certain way can be led to the wrong conclusions. The only way to combat this situation is through communications. In my case, I do not have a staff or a budget to communicate with my constituents, and I cannot depend on the newspapers to get the message right. I often wonder if the reporter attended the same meeting that I did. I can send news releases to the local newspaper, but quite often they will not be published.
The 2012 tax reform bill just highlighted the details of this struggle. The House has been working with the Governor to lower personal income taxes for Kansans and to make our state more competitive in our region. Our logic is that when taxpayers have more money, they have higher levels of economic activity which in turn drives up state revenues and creates a lot of additional jobs,"the multiplier effect.” This is demonstrated by low-tax high growth states throughout the country.
This brings us to my front-line-trench observations of what happened on the tax bill. The Senate, earlier this session, loaded-up the Governor’s tax-cutting bill with a lot of sparkling cuts designed to generate campaign fodder for themselves. But this bill had so many large tax cuts, which they thought it would be assurance of a defeat in the House. The Senate expressed their excuse that the purpose was to get a bill to take into a House-Senate conference committee where it could be pared back to an affordable level. However, the issue is never the issue. The real political reason, in my opinion, was to have an Etch-a-Sketch ability to change positions for the election. The senate moderates saw this as a way to win both ways: brag about cutting taxes in postcards in the upcoming election, and at the same time spend a lot of money in state services, to the satisfaction of their political supporters, since they thought that once their tax bill was killed there will be no reduction in taxes this session. The factions often disagree over whether a provision is a purposeful poison pill or simply a demonstration of the majority's ability to write bills reflecting their own priorities, you can be the judge.
We witnessed an historic parliamentary battle. Earlier in the day we received credible information that the senate leadership planned to break its promise on the tax conference committee agreement. Instead of passing the agreed-to compromise they planned to kill the conference committee report with the resulting procedural effect of killing the underlying Senate tax plan, which they had passed earlier in the session. This would have left Kansas without a tax reduction this year to prime the lagging economy.
Concerned about this imminent procedural move, the Governor asked to address our House caucus. He urged us to protect progress on the tax reform by concurring in the Senate amendments to the tax plan. He did this in good faith as the only remaining pathway available to prevent the Senate from killing all hope of tax reform in 2012.
In an unprecedented conflict, the Kansas House and Senate went head-to-head in a procedural/filibuster battle. Each legislative body used parliamentary moves in an effort to be the first chamber to take the deciding action.
The result was almost identical rules, by the Senate President and House Speaker, forcing an end to filibuster debate and a vote on the respective tax programs. The interruption of debate drew outraged comments on both floors.
In the House, the howls of protest came from democrats and moderate republicans who opposed the measure before the House. But in the Senate, the same howls of protest came from conservative republicans, using the same indignant words that cited the unfairness of limiting debate of an important issue. Although the politics in either chamber sharply contrast each other, the rhetoric of indignation was virtually identical. The words were used interchangeably by conservative-republicans in the Senate and moderate-republicans/democrats on the House floor.
As the drama continued to unfold the opposition voices used explanation of vote to prolong the filibuster in both chambers, the leadership imposed time limits to reduce debate. This was done to allow the competing chamber an opportunity to approve their version. Since the senate is a smaller body, they were at a disadvantage to the House. So opposition members extended their filibuster by rising and requesting that they be allowed to "join" another member in that member's remarks, this took several additional minutes.
Every single member was undoubtedly aware of what was happening. The Senate was racing to kill tax reform before the House had a chance to save it. In the House we followed the Rules of the House and Mason’s Manual of Legislative Procedure. Mason’s specifically addresses the dilatory tactics by members intending to delay consideration of legislative business. This is what the Speaker used to end debate. Parliamentary rules are in place to protect both the members and the institution. They should neither be abused nor ignored. However, a lot of people were upset by the process. I think that it will take a lot of diplomacy and political pragmatism to bring this session to a reasonable end.
House Speaker, Mike O'Neal, won the day by summarily cutting-off debate. Thus, the House won the stand-off, gaining a final action vote on its version of the tax bill and approving it on a 64-59 margin. Moments later, the President of the Senate conceded defeat by announcing that the House action had effectively killed the Senate's debate. The bill that was sent to the Governor is the Senate’s own plan (It passed the Senate on a vote of 29-11).
This tax bill, approved by the House, has been dubbed the "nuclear option" because it projects state government deficits of more than $2 billion in coming years. Meanwhile, the failed conference committee report before the Senate had a much lower price tag and was the product of both chambers’ committees.
Where does that leave the tax issue? The Governor is faced with either signing a bill with a huge price tag that can only be offset by the very optimistic and unrealistic projections of economic growth, or the other option is to hold this tax bill and await receipt of a new tax compromise. If he gets the compromise, he’ll sign it. If he doesn’t, he’ll sign the original bill. The bottom line is that the Senate has the ultimate control over what choice the Governor makes.
Although this tax plan is not the House’s first choice, the House is committed to enact reform this year, and hopes that the Senate will take action on the proposal previously agreed upon during the conference committee. The final budget agreement is contingent on whether such a tax compromise is reached and passed. Passage of a tax compromise would give the Budget Conference Committee more flexibility toward meeting budget goals and maintaining a healthy ending balance. In my opinion both of these issues are also dependant on having an agreement on re-districting.
There are concerns by many people on the impact of this dramatic tax reform. I hope that you take the time to share your thoughts on this issue. We all have the same goal for our state, growth and quality of life; we just might have different perspectives on how we get there.
In service to Kansas,
Rep Mario Goico
https://chumly.com/n/1387631
Monday, January 23, 2012
Week Two January 16-20, 2012
Dear Friends,
It is a truly an honor to serve the citizens of the 100th District. My main priority during my ten years’ tenure in the legislature has been to reduce the size of government and grow the Kansas economy. I believe that we need to create more jobs. The only way to accomplish this goal is to make our state one of the most competitive in the region in order to keep the businesses that we have and attract new companies.
Recently, Boeing announced their decision to leave Wichita and take with them many high paying jobs. I think that this action points to the need to continue to improve the business climate in Kansas. We should not waver from maintaining a constant push for less government, lower taxes, and a repeal of unneeded regulations.
Research shows Kansas has one of the highest tax rates in the region and we are consistently losing workers to nearby states with lower tax rates. We need to be committed to developing favorable tax policy that enables employers to create jobs, entices new business to relocate to Kansas, and ensures residents will continue to live and work in our state. Our State has a diverse economy which presents a considerable challenge for any type of major tax policy changes. Any changes to the current tax code will not come without exhaustive study and deliberation. Feedback from all points of view is a critical part of this process, I encourage you to involve yourself in the process and express your views.
Please take the time to track the Legislature’s work. Right now new policy proposals are being aired and discussed. Different perspectives are being expressed, and as a result we are seeing the beginning form of key policy programs. I believe this is an important part of the process to define legislation that will shape the future of Kansas. As you know, the devil is in the details and many components of these policies are still subject to change. Just because a concept is being proposed doesn’t mean that it will become law. My intent, through this newsletter, is to keep you, my constituents, informed. That is why I need for you to let me know your thoughts on the issues that are being discussed. I need to know any ideas that you might have on how to modify these proposals, and how they are going to affect you. Please feel free to call me, e-mail me at goicorep100@cox.net, or leave me a message at www.mariogoico.com. Thank you for the honor of serving you!
Respectfully yours,
Rep. Mario Goico
Tax Proposal (The Talk Intensifies)
My Summary
Last year, the House passed tax reform legislation that would have strengthened the economy while protecting low-income Kansans. However, the Senate failed to act on those bills.
I believe that we need the reforms that were started in the House. We need a comprehensive tax reform specifically directed at growing the private sector economic base and creating more private sector jobs. This has to be accomplished in a socially responsible manner; we should not increase the tax burden on lower-income Kansans. The Governor and the House have proposed that all revenue increase over 2 % should be used to first reduce the individual income tax brackets. I think that this should be 2 % or the inflation rate, whichever is highest.
I agree that we should not eliminate home mortgage interest and charitable deductions. However, eliminating the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and moving it to social service programs (where federal matches would increase the $60 million to more than $113 million) makes sense. Accelerating severance tax receipts from new wells for two years also makes sense (our citizens should derive some benefit from our natural resources). The House vision will focus on growth and job creation while insuring a healthy ending cash balance to keep our state on a sound fiscal basis. I also like the emphasis on reducing the low and moderate income tax brackets (middle class) on an accelerated basis.
The House’s Conceptual Tax Bill
Basically, the House agrees with the Governor’s plan. Their main modifications are in maintaining current tax deductions, credits and exemptions; this includes food sales tax refunds, historic tax credits, charitable deductions and mortgage deductions, while following the Governor’s pro-growth, pro-jobs recommendations of allowing small businesses to retain non-wage profits and to reinvest that capital back into their businesses in order to create new jobs. It would maintain the statutory sales tax sunset, passed during the 2010 session, which lowers the sales tax rate to 5.7 percent in 2013. The House plan depends almost solely on revenue increases above 2% a year to finance the reductions in rates across the tax brackets. The plan proposes to spread the savings possible by the 2% lid on increases in state spending with an emphasis on reducing the low and moderate tax brackets on an accelerated basis. The House also endorses the Governor’s plan to accelerate the severance tax collection on new wells and the proposed expansion of the successful Rural Opportunity Zone (ROZ) program.
State Budget
The proposed reduction in the 2013 State General Fund is a minuscule 6% (approximately $39 million), not large but is at least the beginning of a decrease. The ending balance is proposed at $365 million or a 6.2%. Note that this amount is short of the statutory 7.5% (which has not been achieved since 2002).
Obamacare
Lt. Governor Dr. Jeff Colyer joined an important amicus brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Hunting and Fishing Licenses
A bill was introduced that would eliminate free hunting and fishing licenses for Kansans who are 65 years old. I oppose this bill
Redistricting Kansas
The state of Kansas is in the process of redrawing its Congressional and Legislative boundaries based on the 2010 census figures. The population of Kansas has grown in the eastern part of the state while western Kansas continues to struggle with a declining population. Expectations are that one Kansas Senate (70,986 persons) and three Kansas House (22,761 persons) seats will shift from the West to the East.
Public hearings throughout the state were held on the redistricting process over the summer and fall. Before the 2012 session can come to an end, new district maps must be approved by the Legislature so they can get final approval from the court for the August 2012 primary election and November 2012 general election.
I personally find it very difficult and challenging to part with any friends, neighbors or constituents. Unfortunately my district has grown too much.
Caylee’s Law – HB 2440
I’m one of the sponsors of HB 2440, Caylee’s Law. This is one of the first priorities in the Republican caucus for 2012. Caylee Anthony, a 2-year-old, disappeared in Florida in 2008. Anthony’s mother, Casey, failed to notify authorities of her daughter’s disappearance for a month. Current Kansas’ law does not view this sort of negligence as a crime, and does not impose criminal penalties for failing to notify law enforcement of the death or disappearance of a child. This bill will create those standards. This bill is an essential tool for prosecutors to better protect Kansas children.
In the fall of 2011, Penn State University was rocked by allegations that former football coach Jerry Sandusky had been caught sexually assaulting or inappropriately interacting with underage boys on or near university property. Subsequent investigations appeared to reveal that eyewitness accounts of the abuse were not reported to proper university and law enforcement authorities.
This Regents Reporting Requirements bill requires all state post-secondary educational institutions to develop reporting standards for cases of abuse. In addition, the Kansas Board of Regents will require each regent institution to formalize individual standards for reporting abuse.
State Archives Available Online
The Kansas Historical Society has partnered with the popular family history website, ancestry.com to allow individuals with valid Kansas driver’s licenses free access to over 8 million Kansas records. To access the records, users need to access www.kshs.org/ancestry and enter their name, date of birth and Kansas driver’s license number. Once the number is authenticated, users will be redirected to ancestry.com.
Users will be able to access Kansas census records from 1865 to 1985; Civil War enlistment papers of Kansas Volunteer Regiments (1862, 1863, and 1868); Russell County vital and probate records; selected World War I manuscripts; and United Spanish-American War veterans certificate collections.
The Historical Society also has a digital portal providing access to 200,000 images of photographs, artifacts, diaries, letters, maps and other printed materials at www.kansasmemory.org.
Please, let me know your thoughts on these issues. Feel free to e-mail me at mario.goico@house.ks.gov any time. I’d be happy to discuss any topic with you. Thank you for the honor and privilege of serving you!
http://chumly.com/n/fbf889
It is a truly an honor to serve the citizens of the 100th District. My main priority during my ten years’ tenure in the legislature has been to reduce the size of government and grow the Kansas economy. I believe that we need to create more jobs. The only way to accomplish this goal is to make our state one of the most competitive in the region in order to keep the businesses that we have and attract new companies.
Recently, Boeing announced their decision to leave Wichita and take with them many high paying jobs. I think that this action points to the need to continue to improve the business climate in Kansas. We should not waver from maintaining a constant push for less government, lower taxes, and a repeal of unneeded regulations.
Research shows Kansas has one of the highest tax rates in the region and we are consistently losing workers to nearby states with lower tax rates. We need to be committed to developing favorable tax policy that enables employers to create jobs, entices new business to relocate to Kansas, and ensures residents will continue to live and work in our state. Our State has a diverse economy which presents a considerable challenge for any type of major tax policy changes. Any changes to the current tax code will not come without exhaustive study and deliberation. Feedback from all points of view is a critical part of this process, I encourage you to involve yourself in the process and express your views.
Please take the time to track the Legislature’s work. Right now new policy proposals are being aired and discussed. Different perspectives are being expressed, and as a result we are seeing the beginning form of key policy programs. I believe this is an important part of the process to define legislation that will shape the future of Kansas. As you know, the devil is in the details and many components of these policies are still subject to change. Just because a concept is being proposed doesn’t mean that it will become law. My intent, through this newsletter, is to keep you, my constituents, informed. That is why I need for you to let me know your thoughts on the issues that are being discussed. I need to know any ideas that you might have on how to modify these proposals, and how they are going to affect you. Please feel free to call me, e-mail me at goicorep100@cox.net, or leave me a message at www.mariogoico.com. Thank you for the honor of serving you!
Respectfully yours,
Rep. Mario Goico
Tax Proposal (The Talk Intensifies)
My Summary
Last year, the House passed tax reform legislation that would have strengthened the economy while protecting low-income Kansans. However, the Senate failed to act on those bills.
I believe that we need the reforms that were started in the House. We need a comprehensive tax reform specifically directed at growing the private sector economic base and creating more private sector jobs. This has to be accomplished in a socially responsible manner; we should not increase the tax burden on lower-income Kansans. The Governor and the House have proposed that all revenue increase over 2 % should be used to first reduce the individual income tax brackets. I think that this should be 2 % or the inflation rate, whichever is highest.
I agree that we should not eliminate home mortgage interest and charitable deductions. However, eliminating the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and moving it to social service programs (where federal matches would increase the $60 million to more than $113 million) makes sense. Accelerating severance tax receipts from new wells for two years also makes sense (our citizens should derive some benefit from our natural resources). The House vision will focus on growth and job creation while insuring a healthy ending cash balance to keep our state on a sound fiscal basis. I also like the emphasis on reducing the low and moderate income tax brackets (middle class) on an accelerated basis.
The House’s Conceptual Tax Bill
Basically, the House agrees with the Governor’s plan. Their main modifications are in maintaining current tax deductions, credits and exemptions; this includes food sales tax refunds, historic tax credits, charitable deductions and mortgage deductions, while following the Governor’s pro-growth, pro-jobs recommendations of allowing small businesses to retain non-wage profits and to reinvest that capital back into their businesses in order to create new jobs. It would maintain the statutory sales tax sunset, passed during the 2010 session, which lowers the sales tax rate to 5.7 percent in 2013. The House plan depends almost solely on revenue increases above 2% a year to finance the reductions in rates across the tax brackets. The plan proposes to spread the savings possible by the 2% lid on increases in state spending with an emphasis on reducing the low and moderate tax brackets on an accelerated basis. The House also endorses the Governor’s plan to accelerate the severance tax collection on new wells and the proposed expansion of the successful Rural Opportunity Zone (ROZ) program.
State Budget
The proposed reduction in the 2013 State General Fund is a minuscule 6% (approximately $39 million), not large but is at least the beginning of a decrease. The ending balance is proposed at $365 million or a 6.2%. Note that this amount is short of the statutory 7.5% (which has not been achieved since 2002).
Obamacare
Lt. Governor Dr. Jeff Colyer joined an important amicus brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Hunting and Fishing Licenses
A bill was introduced that would eliminate free hunting and fishing licenses for Kansans who are 65 years old. I oppose this bill
Redistricting Kansas
The state of Kansas is in the process of redrawing its Congressional and Legislative boundaries based on the 2010 census figures. The population of Kansas has grown in the eastern part of the state while western Kansas continues to struggle with a declining population. Expectations are that one Kansas Senate (70,986 persons) and three Kansas House (22,761 persons) seats will shift from the West to the East.
Public hearings throughout the state were held on the redistricting process over the summer and fall. Before the 2012 session can come to an end, new district maps must be approved by the Legislature so they can get final approval from the court for the August 2012 primary election and November 2012 general election.
I personally find it very difficult and challenging to part with any friends, neighbors or constituents. Unfortunately my district has grown too much.
Caylee’s Law – HB 2440
I’m one of the sponsors of HB 2440, Caylee’s Law. This is one of the first priorities in the Republican caucus for 2012. Caylee Anthony, a 2-year-old, disappeared in Florida in 2008. Anthony’s mother, Casey, failed to notify authorities of her daughter’s disappearance for a month. Current Kansas’ law does not view this sort of negligence as a crime, and does not impose criminal penalties for failing to notify law enforcement of the death or disappearance of a child. This bill will create those standards. This bill is an essential tool for prosecutors to better protect Kansas children.
In the fall of 2011, Penn State University was rocked by allegations that former football coach Jerry Sandusky had been caught sexually assaulting or inappropriately interacting with underage boys on or near university property. Subsequent investigations appeared to reveal that eyewitness accounts of the abuse were not reported to proper university and law enforcement authorities.
This Regents Reporting Requirements bill requires all state post-secondary educational institutions to develop reporting standards for cases of abuse. In addition, the Kansas Board of Regents will require each regent institution to formalize individual standards for reporting abuse.
State Archives Available Online
The Kansas Historical Society has partnered with the popular family history website, ancestry.com to allow individuals with valid Kansas driver’s licenses free access to over 8 million Kansas records. To access the records, users need to access www.kshs.org/ancestry and enter their name, date of birth and Kansas driver’s license number. Once the number is authenticated, users will be redirected to ancestry.com.
Users will be able to access Kansas census records from 1865 to 1985; Civil War enlistment papers of Kansas Volunteer Regiments (1862, 1863, and 1868); Russell County vital and probate records; selected World War I manuscripts; and United Spanish-American War veterans certificate collections.
The Historical Society also has a digital portal providing access to 200,000 images of photographs, artifacts, diaries, letters, maps and other printed materials at www.kansasmemory.org.
Please, let me know your thoughts on these issues. Feel free to e-mail me at mario.goico@house.ks.gov any time. I’d be happy to discuss any topic with you. Thank you for the honor and privilege of serving you!
http://chumly.com/n/fbf889
Monday, January 16, 2012
Way to go Learjet! We need more companies helping Kansas like you
The Associated Press: Learjet announces plan to expand Kansas operations:: www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g-J2R_s...352d1
http://chumly.com/n/f781b1
http://chumly.com/n/f781b1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)